Brené Brown, author of Dare to Lead, has spent seven years driven by the desire to answer the following question: “What, if anything, about the way people are leading today needs to change in order for leaders to be successful in a complex, rapidly changing environment where we’re faced with seemingly intractable challenges and an insatiable demand for innovation?” The answer she landed upon, after talking with 150 C-suite folks from around the world, is interesting: we need daring leaders, “braver leaders and more courageous Read more
There is an all-too-common, yet harmful, dynamic in nonprofits that I refer to as a hierarchy of importance. Left unchecked, an organization that embraces this hierarchy —by commission or omission—hurts the organization.
I’m not talking about the organizational chart, which, in a visual way, does demonstrate a hierarchy. Left to my own devices, I would do away with organization charts, and come up with another way to demonstrate the one value they do have: showing ascending degrees of responsibility, though not power, and the interconnections, both Read more
l am not a romantic. I think Valentine’s Day sends the wrong message: only really appreciate the ones you love once a year, as opposed to every day. So, call me hypocritical for suggesting that we should all write a valentine to the nonprofit sector. Here’s mine.
I am propelled to do this in light of a recent conversation my Masters students have been having in response to an assignment. It is an assignment I give every time I teach this class, and students have Read more
Growing up in Washington, DC, one of my favorite places to go was to the Foucault Pendulum in the Smithsonian’s Museum of Natural History. I could stand there for hours, mesmerized by the consistent movement of the pendulum, swinging back and forth, moving around the circle as the floor, not the pendulum, rotated with the earth as it spun on its axis, but always—always—coming back through the center. (The purpose of a Foucault Pendulum, in case you Read more
Nonprofits are used to hearing my strong warning that without at least one full-time, dedicated development professional on staff, they were jeopardizing their financial viability. As our nonprofit landscape became more and more competitive, the challenges of fundraising grew. The pool of dollars for which we all were vying was not keeping pace with the growth of the sector, the need to have different strategies for different generations of individual donors, and the seemingly rapid change of donor priorities, added complexity. Thus, it was no Read more
Recent events have led me to contemplate the duality of leading with the heart vs. the head.
Last week, a long-time member of an executive director peer learning circle I facilitate died. Early in the fall she told the group that her cancer had returned and she began chemo again. In our early December session, she announced that she could no longer give her job the attention it deserved and she would be stepping down at the end of the year. A courageous woman, she had Read more
“Do more for more with less.” How often do we hear that suggestion, primarily from funders, but also from board members and even executive directors? To promote doing more for more with fewer resources presumes you were either previously wasting money, spending more than you should have been and/or you don’t care about the quality of services you are providing and the results you are achieving with your clients.
There are, however, some incidences where less is more. For example, putting less policy and unnecessary specifics Read more
There isn’t a position on your organizational chart that can’t be better executed by someone who understands not just the power and importance of good communication, but who understands how to be a great communicator. A recent Nonprofit Center email blast about an upcoming communications class* cited author and presidential speechwriter James Humes making the connection between communication skills and leadership. He once famously said that if Winston Churchill had used a speechwriter instead of sharing his own words, Britain would be speaking German.
The communications Read more